Tech Guru

Trusted Source Technology

Musings on Physics and the Occult – Component 1

Musings on Physics and the Occult – Component 1

Outside of rationale : Throughout the scientific age, substantially of humanity has denied everything relevant to magick and mysticism, which include of program, religion. I do not contend that there was no excellent motive for this volte-face, for faith and mysticism experienced, throughout the course of hundreds of years, retained the general inhabitants in a condition of superstitious subservience and ignorance. Versus this backdrop, the age of scientific enlightenment arrived as an great blessing to us all. The dissemination of its consequent technologies lifted us from the poverty of an agrarian existence and produced wealth undreamed of by earlier generations. Presented this historic practical experience, one may well well request why on earth would any individual wish to return to the darker times of ignorance – why do some persons even now cling to superstition? The answers to this query actually come up from the accomplishment of science and the impressive successes it has scored in physics, biology and cognitive psychology. Let us start with physics: The holy grail of physics is colloquially acknowledged as the TOE, or Principle of Anything (usually known as Intestine, or Grand Unified Theorem). The intention of this is to devise a principle that simplifies the causative forces that drive all actual physical processes to a solitary set of self contained (self referential?) equations. In the decades due to the fact Einstein, physicists have laboured difficult at this activity, with small clear achievements other than for an intellectual build termed Superstring Concept.

Into the On the lookout Glass of Superstring Idea: A single model of Superstring Theory (taken pretty critically by physicists) suggests that if we Believe that particles exist then these same particles give rise to the forces of which they are made – which in switch give increase to the existence of the particles. I advise that for this concept to maintain drinking water, the equations on which it is primarily based should exist with no time as a issue. For in no other way could we get rid of the causality dilemma of outcome previous result in. Thinking about that relativity and cosmology teach us that time unfolded from the to start with infinitesimal prompt of the Significant Bang, it would appear to be that the physics of generation and causality is in some degree of inconsistency and disarray (and I necessarily mean no disrespect to the great science of physics by saying this):

Anything from Absolutely nothing: My subsequent point of contention with physics is the phenomenon of the spontaneous development of particle pairs in vacuum. Apparently, the deep vacuum of space has strength and quantum physics predicts and types this phenomenon. Allow me all over again technique this as a layman (which I am). Physicists detect fluctuations in energy in vacuum, in three dimensional house wherever no gas clouds or other particles exist. These are discussed by the spontaneous generation of particle / anti particle pairs that rapidly terminate every single other out and vanish with a smaller release of power. Ignore for a instant the obvious dilemma of repeatedly including to the power of the universe: We can be rather certain there is an solution for that (and physicists are damned good persons). My problem is that: If the particles show up within just vacant place, from whence does their electrical power derive? If it is inside the universe, then we have a universe of infinite opportunity strength, and I do not consider this is permitted by physics (unless of course we think about the highly speculative challenge of Zero Issue Power, which, for the minute, we will not). If the resource of these particles is outdoors the universe then we must contemplate that our total universe is permeated at each point by a membrane that separates our time and space and we simply just ought to adhere to the compulsion of logic and request: from what? I do not dispute the actuality of the noticed phenomena, but, as we shall see, I do have my have concepts on the fundamental buildings of the universe that cause them.

Time and No Time: Many of the phenomena of the actual physical globe occur at the degree of extremely damned small, and at the extremely smallest level, they tend to be quantum phenomena, described in the fantastically profitable theories of quantum physics. SO what are these phenomena and why do I have a challenge with time in this context? Take the emission of light-weight as an illustration. Gentle exists (in 1 perception) as discrete packets of strength, fired from atoms as they change their power condition from large to low. What this suggests is that if an electron circling a nucleus drops from a significant electrical power condition to a reduced (and falls in nearer to the nucleus), it emits a photon of energy, and of system, photonic energy is what we contact light-weight. The issue is that there is no time interval for the transition, persuasive is to acknowledge that quantum changeover would seem to take place in zero time (and again, I cordially invite any physicist to correct me). So the moment once again, we run in a domain without having time, and we need to check with, why? Is there a pattern here in the many discoveries and designs of physics? A trend that implies a timeless fact fundamental the universe as we at this time perceive it? One more fascinating aspect of time is that it is not continuous for each and every item in the universe according to relativity, every little thing exists in its personal independent time as a perform of its velocity and the consequences of gravity. This phenomenon is generally termed Time Dilation. Imagine you are on a star ship, travelling at near to the pace of mild. This exquisite (and confirmed ) concept tells us that if you measured a yr on board your ship, perhaps 1000’s of a long time would have passed on Earth when you returned. So far so great: as you go speedier and quicker, your time reference changes and time dilates for you and these on the ship. There are a few of troubles, of course. The more quickly you vacation, the shorter the ship receives (to all those on the lookout from the exterior), the extra huge (heavier) the ship (and you) become and the far more vitality it requires to travel and accelerate the ship. The restrict is that at mild pace your ship would reach infinite mass and call for infinite electrical power to push it , which provides the final bodily limitation to even very rapidly sub-luminal space journey. Even so, mild photons are reported to have vitality. They are also explained to have zero mass! In accordance to Einstein, e=mc2. So a photon which has energy need to undoubtedly have an equivalent mass. What on Earth is going on right here? As soon as once again, as we method a limit, in this situation mild-speed, we find inconsistencies in concept. But the challenge goes deeper than this, as we will see. When we measure light, we can evaluate it in just one of two strategies: as particles (photons) or as waves. What this usually means is that mild is like a schizophrenic statistic inasmuch that what you see is dependent on how you seem at it. I am not likely to describe these experiments listed here. I am although, going to give you one of the chief outcomes: If we hearth a stream of gentle photons at a surface with two slits in it, just about every photon goes as a result of equally slits concurrently. Wow! Can we take this? A particle that need to have infinite mass, travelling at the velocity of light can be shown to be in two destinations at the similar time! On that be aware, allow us depart the area of physics for now, and move on to biology.

The Science of Life: Have you at any time thought of the elementary big difference amongst things residing and things dead? Guaranteed, dwelling things try to eat (always), reproduce (typically), excrete (generally), and so on and so on. But these are factors that residing items do, not what dwelling points are. Allow us carry on to an case in point. Consider a basic organism, this kind of as a microbe, or a virus. Envision for a minute that we are ready to make a duplicate, phase by phase, developing each individual gene, just about every chromosome, action by move. What would we have/ A living entity or a superbly created imitation? Knowledge so significantly indicates the latter. But we have genetic engineering! I listen to you protest. So we do. And we are very great at manipulating points now alive. We can splice a fish gene into a strawberry and breed a frost resistant pressure or splice a jellyfish gene into a mouse and breed luminescent mice (how my cats would adore that!). But can we really make a little something residing from inert tissue? The answer is a resounding no. In simple fact, some scientists think about that we have not the vaguest notion what separates a person selection of molecules from that similar assortment of molecules in a “dwelling” creature. Further, they believe that whilst we can winkle the very same reactions out of equally sets of molecules, a person is undoubtedly “alive” and the other is “lifeless” – and no one particular is familiar with why. They acknowledge this as a terrific thriller. No matter whether it is probable to construct a virus (a correct virus in every single feeling of the phrase) commencing with chemicals in numerous bottles, I can’t say. I have by no means heard of any one getting carried out it. I would think that if an individual did reach it, then it would be big news all around the globe. Because that has not happened I presume that no one has done it. But biochemists are on a regular basis doing points with DNA that appear awfully shut to the virus situation inserting DNA into cells and obtaining it to do all types of fascinating things. So we truly have no clue as to what everyday living is. So how on earth can science make statements (and with these clamour!) that life arises spontaneously from sophisticated molecules. This is really unscientific and no unique to the myriad religious promises for the origins of existence. It also points out why science is so determined to uncover lifetime on any other planet: to reinforce a pretty weak case for lifestyle arising spontaneously. It appears to be to me that for all the successes and miracles of the organic sciences, we have run into a brick wall listed here. So enable us think this trouble solved and go on to our subsequent good thriller. When we have the humble microbe swimming about in the nutrient soup of early earth, evolution normally takes treatment of the rest: or does it? Not seriously in simple fact, not all, as we will now exhibit. And so we move to the following problem, which is that of human consciousness, the quest for artificial intelligence and the massive gulf in between them.

The Quest for Ultimate Truth: What is consciousness? Is it the capacity to assume logically? Is it self awareness? And, the acid check: Can it be programmed into a computer system? There are two principal colleges of imagined on this previous issue: The Potent AI (Synthetic Intelligence) college, that promises that the human mind is just a computer system that will sooner or later be imitated by a personal computer i.e. by a equipment whose internal imagined procedures are purely logical. The Weak AI faculty (to which I subscribe) which proposes that personal computers can not match the human thoughts in its cognitive, intuitive procedures even in principle. So what is the fundamental difference between a computer system (even a monster laptop with as several logic switches and interconnections and the brain has neurons) and a human intellect/brain established. The very first related simple fact is that pcs perform purely on logic, even those with pattern matching systems. Logic is a branch of mathematics. But mathematicians have very long regarded that no set of rules in mathematics can at any time be complete. They thus deduce that people are in a position to deduce truths outside of the ability of logical programs Ever to specific. Look at this: Most of us have a tendency to consider of mathematics as the science of certainty, and that all points are inclined to mathematical examination and for that reason to responses of sure, or no. That this is not the situation has been demonstrated by mathematics. A fantastic Czech mathematician, Kurt Gödel, proved that ALL branches of arithmetic are incomplete and that some propositions (believe equations) within any college cannot be proven without Stepping Outdoors that branch and expanding it. On the other hand, in this now enlarged department of mathematics there would be new propositions that could not be proved with no Stepping Outside yet again, and so advertisement infinitum. What this usually means is that rational considered can never, ever penetrate supreme real truth. Remember, we are speaking about rational deduction listed here, working with the language and resources of mathematics. Allow me give you a really very simple (but difficult) instance of a well known imaginary dialogue with a computer that illustrates the limitations of assumed based mostly on logic by itself: Human: Laptop, if you are designed on the basis of this plan, (Flourishes printout of the application that drives the laptop, the soul of the machine, if I may be so poetic), you will never say that this statement is legitimate, so make sure you explain to me, is my statement correct. Pc: RESOUNDING SILENCE!!! You see, the human understands that the laptop or computer can hardly ever say the statement is genuine. If it does say the statement is genuine then the assertion is untrue. If the assertion is phony, then by stating that it is genuine, the pc is building an untrue assertion. Thus, the human is aware of a true simple fact that the pc are not able to utter. It took me quite a although to have an understanding of this, so you should really not fear if it seems elusive. It genuinely is worthy of the effort of dwelling on this trouble. In help of this stance, I would like to quote the renowned polymath Roger Penrose: The very reality that the mind leads us to truths that are not computable convinces me that a computer system can in no way duplicate the intellect. Allow us now shift on, to the complimentary (not competing or contradictory) observations and approaches of magick and mysticism.

Magick: A Neglected Branch of Science: Ahead of the latest scientific age, human beings experienced limited usually means to penetrate the mysteries of the universe, significantly much less to improve their ecosystem in the multifarious means we do today. Even so, the need to do so was just as terrific. So our forebears did what they could and appropriately, they: 1. Formulated a design of the universe based on observation of physical and mental phenomena. 2. Experimented on and explored the universe with the ability of the brain immediately. This is the basis for magick. The model to which I refer is The Tree of Daily life, a composite glyph deriving from Qabbalah. This design tries to build a framework within just which every single facet of the universe will suit into a set of interlocking associations. It would be unwise for me to endeavor a thorough clarification of this product right here, but I will give the briefest define probable.

The Tree of Lifetime – A Universal Product: The Tree is built from 10 emanations (Sephiroth). The uppermost (Kether) represents the position source of generation – by meditation and instinct, historic Qabalists attributed all of generation to a solitary point supply from which all else arises. This we now know to be real physically, through our being familiar with of the Huge Bang function. But Keter is far more than this Keter implies that the primary unity from which we all derive exists not just physically in one particular issue in house time, but universally by all time and house. Keter also exists microcosmically in every single human being and each and every bodily and mental and religious phenomenon in anyway. Now offered the synthesis of so many issues inside one particular solitary build, one particular may possibly feel that we are setting up an Gordian knot for ourselves, a tangled puzzle intractable to evaluation. But this is not the scenario, and below is the vital point: If we method the concept of Keter with our minds unhindered by believed, then we straight access its fact and electrical power on in anyway degree we may pick. This is the reverse of reductionist science inasmuch that we the two penetrate the mystery and observe it from a length simultaneously. In thoughtless meditational states and in the throws of controlled magical ritual, we accessibility truth on an altogether distinct amount, and I think that that level is a degree of reality that lies further than mathematical logic, outside of the confines of four dimensional area-time, a domain from which daily life alone emanates and leeches into our commonplace earth. [Note: Keter is the first of ten Sephiroth.]

Driving the Veil: We have now reviewed briefly the constraints confronted by reductionist science as it asymptotically techniques the ultimate mysteries of everyday living, consciousness and the basic character of place-time. We have also, all as well briefly, indicated that humans have the capacity to penetrate these mysteries with a instrument intended just for that reason: the wonderful powers of the human brain.